Sennheiser is one amongst the extra standard manufacturers on this planet by methodology of fantastic headphones, known for its over-ear items bask in the legendary HD 650. Nevertheless Sennheiser also makes earbuds, and for the past few weeks, I’ve been making an attempt out two of Sennheiser’s wireless alternate choices, which seem aesthetic identical in the starting put gaze: the $199.ninety five Momentum HD1 Free, and its more cost effective counterpart, the $Ninety nine.ninety five CX 6.00 BT.
The Momentum HD1 Free and CX 6.00 BT conception virtually about identical. The hardware for the cables, the in-line a long way away on the precise earbud, the battery module on the left earbud, are all the valid same — the 2 merchandise even allotment the same FCC ID. Both headphones have Bluetooth 4.2 and strengthen Qualcomm aptX and aptX Low Latency audio for bigger quality playback, assuming your tool supports it, which is lustrous seeing as, over again, they’re extra or less the same. The principle visible distinction? The HD1 Free contains a red color blueprint, whereas the CX 6.00 BT is blue.
Nevertheless that’s all surface stage stuff. Things exchange do you have to procure to the earbuds — and the audio. The Momentum HD1 Free has earbuds which are virtually twice as neat as those on the CB 6.00 BT, presumably to supply extra in the methodology of drivers and acoustics. Sennheiser doesn’t if fact be told dive into what the functional differences are on an audio stage with the exception of announcing that the HD1 Free supply a grand broader frequency response and better most sound strain stage. Nevertheless it absolutely’s that distinction between the earbuds that in theory makes up the $a hundred distinction between the more cost effective and the dearer versions.
As for whether or no longer it’s value paying twice as grand for the HD1 Free over the CX 6.00BT? That’s more challenging to claim. There is simply a noticeable enchancment in how the HD1 Free sounds — the bigger earbuds supply a grand broader sound with better bass than the CX 6.00BT, nonetheless it’s no longer a gigantic, life-altering distinction. And unless you’re a hardcore audiophile or have the 2 headphones to compare backward and ahead precise in front of you, you’d barely scrutinize what you’re lacking. Given the $a hundred savings, I’d most ceaselessly stick to the CX 6.00BT.
Both headphones are entirely overjoyed ample to wear — Sennheiser touts the HD1 Free as its most “compact Bluetooth headphone”, and that looks precise ample (even although the CX 6.00 BT are technically smaller). Both pairs had been entirely overjoyed and light-weight ample to wear for all of the six hours of advertised battery life with out any considerations, and sufficiently exiguous to with out considerations stuff into a pocket when I wasn’t the utilization of them. And as an added bonus, they even stayed in my ears somewhat neatly, something that I have a tendency to for my half fight with when the utilization of in-ear headphones. It’s here in actuality where the smaller earbuds of the CX 6.00BT gave it an advantage — I found they stayed in my ears better with out the additional bulk of the HD1 Free, which used to be precious for working out.
I’m aloof no longer entirely offered on the set apart part of wireless earbuds bask in this, and all of the cleave of the exchange aloof feels bask in a stepping stone toward in actuality wireless earbuds bask in Apple’s AirPods that might perchance at closing die out. The true fact that Sennheiser has already launched two different versions of what are actually the same headphones already speaks to that: each the HD1 Free and the CX 6.00 BT are appropriate a novel set apart part for the corporate’s popular neckband vogue headphones, the Sennheiser HD1 Wireless and the Sennheiser CX 7.00BT, respectively.
Nevertheless for now, we’re aloof caught with the vestiges of wires, and the Sennheisers are each completely gorgeous alternate choices if that’s the vogue that works for you. Nevertheless they’re also proof of the incontrovertible truth that essentially the most pricey choice isn’t ceaselessly the easiest one.