In other news bears shit within the woods. In nowadays’s second day Trump news: President ‘The Donald’ has seized, belatedly, on the European Commission’s announcement the day past that it had chanced on Google responsible of three kinds of illegal antitrust habits with its Android OS since 2011 and grow to be fining the firm $5 billion; a file-breaking penalty which the Commission’s antitrust chief, Margrethe Vestager, acknowledged reflects the length and gravity of the firm’s opponents infringements.
Trump is no longer! in any recognize! contented! though!
“I suggested you so!” he has tweeted triumphantly honest appropriate now. “The European Union honest appropriate slapped a 5 Billion Dollar magnificent on no doubt one of our massive companies, Google . They truly beget taken abet of the U.S., but no longer for long!”
I suggested you so! The European Union honest appropriate slapped a 5 Billion Dollar magnificent on no doubt one of our massive companies, Google. They truly beget taken abet of the U.S., but no longer for long!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 19, 2018
Also no longer so very way attend, Trump grow to be the one grumbling about U.S. tech giants. Even though Amazon is his most frequent target in tech, while Google has been spared the identical outdated tweet lashings. Albeit, on the realistic day he might per chance well honest no longer necessarily be in a blueprint to explain one tech massive from any other.
Vestager can though, and he or she cited Amazon as no doubt one of many companies that had suffered as a straight away outcomes of contractual stipulations Google imposed on tool makers the usage of its Android OS — squeezing the ecommerce massive’s skill to fabricate a competing Android ecosystem, with its Fire OS.
Presumably, for Trump, Amazon is no longer ‘no doubt one of our massive companies’ though.
As a minimum it’s easiest Google that will get his paunchy Twitter consideration — and a particular Trumpian MAGA badge of honor name-out as “no doubt one of our massive companies” — within the tweet.
Presumably, he hasn’t had this pointed out to him but though. So, uh, awkward.
Honorable to narrate, Trump is seizing on Google’s antitrust penalty as a stick with beat the EU, blueprint towards a backdrop of Trump already having slapped a series of tariffs on EU items, and Trump recently threatening the EU with tariffs on cars — in what is snappy taking a look love a paunchy blown commerce conflict.
Even so, Trump’s tweet doubtlessly wasn’t the roughly reinforce Google hoped to solicit by way of its dangle Twitter missive the day past…
#AndroidWorksButTradeWarsDon’t doesn’t form for essentially the most tidy hashtag.
But here’s the article: Vestager has already spoke back to Trump’s attack on the Android resolution — despite the truth that it’s taking space a day slack. Since the EU’s “tax lady”, as Trump has been known to vaguely consult with her, is every lit and onit.
All by way of the day past’s press conference she grow to be particularly asked to beget a study for Trump’s tantrum response on listening to the EU antitrust resolution towards Google, and whether she wasn’t worried it is going to electrify next week’s meeting between the US president and the European Commission’s president, Jean-Claude Juncker.
“As I know my US colleagues prefer magnificent opponents honest appropriate moreover to we operate,” she spoke back. “There might be a recognize that we operate our job. We beget this very straightforward mission to form obvious that companies play by the rulebook for the market to assist shoppers. And this is also my impact that this is what they need within the US.”
Pressed again on political context, given the worsening commerce relationship between the US and the EU, Vestager grow to be asked how she would trace that her finding towards Google is no longer share of an overarching anti-US fable — and how would she answer Trump’s opponents that the EU’s “tax lady… in actual fact hates the US”.
“Well I’ve performed my dangle truth checking on the principle share of that sentence. I operate work with tax and I am a girl. So this is A hundred% correct,” she replied. “It is no longer correct for the latter share of the sentence though. On fable of I an excellent deal love the US. And I deem that can per chance per chance even be what you deem because of I am from Denmark and that tends to be what we operate. We love the U.S. The tradition, the of us, our chums, touring. However in actual fact that this [finding against Google] has nothing to operate with how I in actual fact feel. Nothing whatsoever. Exact moreover to enforcing opponents laws — effectively, we operate it on this planet but we don’t operate it in a political context. On fable of then there would in no way, ever be a honest appropriate timing.
“The mission is terribly straightforward. We must always provide protection to shoppers and opponents to form obvious that shoppers fetch essentially the most fantastic of magnificent opponents — preference, innovation, most fantastic that you might per chance per chance judge costs. This is what we operate. It has been performed sooner than, we are able to continue to operate it — no topic the political context.”
Per chance Trump might be in a blueprint to be taught the identify of the EU’s “tax lady” if Vestager finally ends up EU president next year.
Or, effectively, maybe no longer. We are able to easiest hope so.